What may bother Prince Harry?
Right wing media, Sky News Australia, Shapiro, Knowles, other windbags blame the couple with a wide range of disloyalties, etc.
But what can be the major issues for the boy who lived when his mother did not?
Not too long ago like ( 9 or 10 years) the very Scotland Yard opened the investigation to take a look again at the fatal collision in Paris, whether it is possible that it was an assassination or not.
The investigation says it was an accident, meanwhile conspiracy theorists say that of course they say that. The very existance of the renewed investigation may show that there are still questions remained unburied.
It looks like that the world moved on but it might be still bothersome, that the recent king finally married his mistress, and the adultress became queen consort, although it takes two to a tango, especially to multiple tangos. What can we say if it is morally acceptable? Especially, when the Church of England is not bothered by it a bit, neither Rowan Williams nor Justin Welby.
Obviously, this might burden the boy who lived, that some authority pretending circle might have murdered his mom. The public does not know, what happened. Maybe, the boy does not know it either, what really happened, especially the “full truth”, but it still might be quite unnerving that a royal soap opera turned into a Macbeth styled drama.
The other issue that the ugly faced Charles might have been not the biological father of Harry. Everybody involved denies that, but something is still fishy.
Who else could have been the father? This still belongs to the realm of conspiracy theories, however the estrangement between Charles and Harry looks a bit more cruel than a usual father and son tension, same with the widening gap between the brothers of the same mother, at least.
Also, the tangible fear in the royal house pervading the conservative media attack on Harry and Meghan is more than talkative, that what might be accidentally unearthed can be more than uncomfortable to the status quo.
It might be also strange to realize that Harry’s real name is Henry, and he is a king material, served in Afghanistan, and he will be surely king in a way or an other, later or sooner, in England or elsewhere.
Regarding England, maybe a forwardpointing step would be to name William king, giving the British royal traditions a new hope and a handsomer face.
VERSUS PAUL 